Sage grouse get a lawyer
By Matthew BeaudinTelluride Daily Planet November 16, 2006
Amy Atwood of the Western Environmental Law Center said the case will challenge the top levels of the U.S. Department of the Interior for directly interfering with the grouse's placement on the Endangered Species List.
This time of the year, people talk about “the bird.” Just so happens
the “bird” is usually a turkey, cavity deep in brine. But in the county
offices it's about another bird entirely: the Gunnison sage grouse.
Last
summer the county jumped on a legal bandwagon riding to Washington to
challenge the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to
exclude the bird, which numbers fewer than 400 in San Miguel County,
from the Endangered Species List last spring.
So while it's
“nice bird, Dad” at one house on Thanksgiving, it's “Save the birds” at
more than a few tables across the country. The county is but one
element of a multi-faceted coalition fighting for stricter protections
and, hopefully, a much-coveted spot on the Endangered Species List.
On
Tuesday, the Western Environmental Law Center filed a suit in U.S.
District Court challenging the non-listing, citing “blatant” violations
of the Endangered Species Act.
Amy Atwood, the case's lead
attorney at the Western Environmental Law Center, said the legal
argument she plans to bring to the courtroom hinges upon the USFWS
decision to not list the bird as “arbitrary and capricious.”
| |
Atwood
said the case will challenge the top levels of the U.S. Department of
the Interior for directly interfering with the bird's placement on the
Endangered Species List, something, she said, the department was ready
to do but was tampered with by Department of the Interior's Deputy
Assistant Secretary, Julie MacDonald.
“What we'll be doing is explaining that the agency's own scientists said the bird should be listed,” Atwood said.
The
USFWS office in Denver issued draft a press release on the bird,
suggesting it be listed under the Endangered Species Act, but Atwood
said that decision was reversed in the Washington office.
The
Denver USFWS office did not have a comment on Thursday, other than that
the agency is reviewing the lawsuit, according to Sharon Rose, a USFWS
official. The department has 60 days to reply to the legal filing.
Some in the county are hoping the suit puts the bird under federal protections.
“All
the best available science suggests the existence of the Gunnison sage
grouse is seriously threatened throughout most of its range,” San
Miguel County Commissioner Art Goodtimes said in a press release. “The
county is pleased to lead this litigation to bring the federal
government back to the table to help local working groups to save this
bird from extinction.”
When the USFWS excluded the bird from the
ESL last spring it also removed the bird from the candidate list,
stating that that threats to the longevity of birds - that are located
in only seven regions between Colorado and Utah - were not of such
scale the addition of the species to the federally-protected list was
merited.
That decision, now formally met in the courtroom, was
initially met with disbelief among some conservationists, with
Goodtimes calling the non-listing an instance of politics trumping
science.
Dave Remington, a biologist with the Colorado
Department of Wildlife, called the science used to determine bird
populations - counting of male birds - “crude,” and also said that the
population has declined over the past 50 years, though he thought the
USFWS had made the correct decision.
The legal fight is the
third dispute between the government and the birds' advocates, but this
cause is more substantial that the others, as it aims to add the bird
to a federally protected list whereas the other two were mismanagement
complaints. Both verdicts thus far have erred in the favor of the
birds; one was won and another settled.
The particular grouse
currently exists in seven populations, six in southwest Colorado and
one in both Colorado and Utah, and the Gunnison Basin population is the
largest and represents the best chance for sustained conservation of
the bird, biologists have said.