Feds abandon appeal of forest management
By H. Josef Hebert, APSierra Sun January 14, 2008
Opponents to the rules had argued they weakened protection for wildlife and the environment to the benefit of the timber industry.
Washington (AP) — The Bush administration has dropped its
appeal of a 2007 court decision that had overturned new management rules for 191
million acres of national forests.
Opponents to the rules had argued
they weakened protection for wildlife and the environment to the benefit of the
timber industry.
The Justice Department notified the 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals last week that it was withdrawing its appeal, saying that the
other parties, including the timber industry, would do likewise.
“We are
glad the Bush administration has thrown in the towel,” said Trent Orr, an
attorney for Earthjustice, one of the environmental advocacy groups that had
challenged the new forest management rules in court.
Last March, a
federal district court in California found that the U.S. Forest Service had
bypassed required environmental reviews and provisions under the Endangered
Species Act in its overhaul of the management rules, including changes in
logging limits, for its national forests.
The case, Citizens for Better
Forestry vs. USDA, challenged recent changes to what must be included in a
forest plan, said Pete Frost, an attorney with the Western Environmental Law
Center, in a phone interview Friday with the Sierra Sun.
“Tahoe National
Forest, for example, has a forest plan or land and resources management plan,”
Frost said. “They are the blueprint for how a forest is managed.”
Frost
said the plans were previously governed by regulations set in 1982 under the
Reagan administration, which Frost described as good, but new regulations
created in 2005 under the Bush administration, which he said were
not.
U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton, acting on a lawsuit filed by
environmentalists, prohibited the further implementation of the revised rules
that were issued in January, 2005.
The lawsuit argued that the new forest
management plan illegally eased logging restrictions and removed a number of
mandatory protections that had been in the previous management regulations,
while also curtailing public participation in developing management
plans.
“The good news is they’ve dropped the appeal,” said Orr in a
telephone interview with the Associated Press. But he said that doesn’t mean the
issue is put to rest.
Last August, the U.S. Forest Service said it was
developing revised rules that it hoped would pass legal
scrutiny.
“They’re just kind of doing the same thing over again. I
suspect the court won’t be any more friendly to this version,” said Orr,
predicting further lawsuits.
— The Sun’s Greyson Howard contributed
to this report.